![]() |
|
Background/Aims: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a heritable connective tissue disorder that affect the skin, joints, blood vessels and internal organs. Patients with EDS are at a higher risk of experiencing different surgical complications depending on the type and severity of the disease. We describe here a case of a patient with EDS Type III who underwent a successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Case report: A 42 year old woman was evaluated for a long lasting and recurrent epigastric pain with a negative Murphy sign. Magnetic Resonance Imaging detected multiple gallstones within the gallbladder without biliary tree dilatation. An uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed.
Conclusion: Surgical intervention in patients with EDS is a challenging topic. It should be
performed by a multidisciplinary team aware of its specific needs and risks. Taking into account these concerns and the type of EDS, we successfully carried out a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our patient.
Case report
A 42 year old woman was evaluated for a long lasting and recurrent epigastric pain with a negative Murphy sign.
The patient had been operated on for appendicular peritonitis, obesity with adjustable gastric band and left anterior cruciate ligament injury.
Laboratory tests remained within normal limits. Radiological studies with abdominal ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging detected multiple calculi within the gallbladder without biliary tree dilatation (fig. 1).
Figure 1 - Cholongio-IRM showing a gallbladder of normal size containing several gallstones
In order to definitely relieve the pain and avoid potentially life-threatening complications such as acute cholecystitis, obstructive cholangitis and pancreatitis, we planned a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Our patient had a well-known Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), Type III, and was wearing Murphy rings (fig. 2) to correct joint hypermobility and instability. We proceeded to a multidisciplinary perioperative management. A senior anesthetic was present during the surgery.
Nurses were also aware of the situation and put padding in place to reduce shear forces and external tissue pressure (1).
We created the pneumoperitoneum with an open laparoscopy instead of a Veress needle. Four trocars were inserted.
Following the concept of culture safety in cholecystectomy (2), we achieved the critical view of safety (3) after releasing peri vesicular adhesions. We correctly identified the two elements of the hepatocystic triangle: the cystic duct and cystic artery (fig. 3). As proposed by Crane (4), we used the Hem-o-lok® ligature system to adapt to the weakness and friability of the tissues (fig. 4). The cystic duct and artery were divided between Hem-o-lok® clips, and an uneventful retrograde cholecystectomy was performed with progressive electro dissection of the gallbladder bed.
Figure 4 - Hem-o-lok® being placed
After the extraction of the gallbladder, we did not notice biliary leak or hemorrhage. Consequently, no drain was left in place. Non absorbable sutures were used to close the wounds.
The patient recovered completely and was discharged to home on the first postoperative day. And, when seen twelve days after the surgery, she was doing well. The follow up at one year was unremarkable.
The histological studies showed a calculous cholecystitis.
Discussion
Most EDS subtypes are caused by defective collagen type I, III and V (5). And, when the patients with EDS need surgery, the poor quality of their connective tissue (1,6,7,8) may present some challenges.
The most common surgical issues are related to fragile blood vessels, wound healing, spontaneous rupture of hollow organs, joint instability and subluxation and hernias (1,5).
In our patient, to avoid the skin bruising, we used good padding as suggested by Weisemann (1). And, considering the risk of atlantoaxial dislocation and temporo-mandibular dysfunction, a senior anesthesio-logist performed the endotracheal intubation without any incident (1).
For the creation of the pneumoperitoneum, we think that open laparoscopy was more safer than the use of Veress needle. It allowed us to prevent a possible iatrogenic intestinal lesion because of the history of appendicular peritonitis. And if ever a bleeding had occurred, it would have been easier to control it in open approach laparoscopy.
The case described by Crane (4) was a Type IV, the vascular type with arterial and hollow organs fragility or spontaneous rupture (5). That was the main reason for them to put a drain and left it in situ for several days. Our patient had a Type III, the hypermobile form with probably less vascular or hollow organs fragility. So, we decided not to place a drain.
The other aspect to be aware of is the poor healing capacity of our patient.
In 2000, seventeen years before the diagnosis of EDS, she had been operated on for left anterior cruciate ligament injury. Absorbable sutures were used which led to wound dehiscence.
Therefore, this time, we used ETHIBOND Excel® (green braided non-absorbable suture) for the closure of aponeurosis and fascia. And, the skin were closed with ETHILON®Nylon suture. No dehiscence was observed.
Conclusion
In patients with EDS, a multidisciplinary approach is advised with a team familiar with the disease and its complications. And, a laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be managed successfully by anticipating the common issues related to the connective tissue frailty.
To avoid an incontrollable bleeding or intestine perforation, open laparoscopy should be preferred to Veress needle puncture approach.
Hem-o-lok ®might be well fit to control possiblebiliary leak or cystic artery bleeding.
A drain might be useful in type IV in order to monitor bleeding, biliary leak or hollow organs perforation.
Wound dehiscence occurs in patients with EDS and non absorbable sutures should be used to reduce the risk.
Conflict of interest: none.
Funding: No financial support.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was not required for this case report.
Acknowledgment
Published with written consent from the patient.
References
1. Wiesmann T, Castori M, Malfait F, Wulf. Recommendations for anesthesia and perioperative management in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome(s). Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014;9:109.
2. Gupta V, Lal P, Vindal A, Singh R, Kapoor VK. Knowledge of the Culture of Safety in Cholecystectomy (COSIC) Among Surgical Residents: Do We Train Them Well For Future Practice? World J Surg. 2021;45(4):971-980.
3. Strasberg SM, Brunt LM. Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211: 132-138.
4. Jasmine Crane, Stephen Lam, Jian Shen Kiam, and Bhaskar Kumar. Minimizing the hidden dangers of cholecystectomy in vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome through multidisciplinary approach. Clin Case Rep. 2021;9(6):e04090.
5. De Paepe A, Malfait F. Bleeding and bruising in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and other collagen vascular disorders. Br J Haematol 2004;127:491–500.
6. Burcharth J, Rosenberg J. Gastrointestinal surgery and related
complications in patients with ehlers-danlos syndrome: a systematic review. Dig Surg. 2012;29:349–357.
7. Germain DP. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:32.
8. Oderich GS, Panneton JM, Bower TC, Lindor NM, Cherry KJ, Noel AA, et al. The spectrum, management and clinical outcome of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV: a 30-year experience. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42(1):98-106.